GPRA Futures Profile: Dr Janice Tan

Dr Janice Tan, practising GP and General Manager of Clinical Innovation at Bupa, highlights the important role GPs and Rural Generalists play in health tech development, and the challenges and opportunities for health innovation in primary care.
Can you please give a brief overview of your career to date?

I started out advising health tech startups, then ended up on the other side of the table advising the companies investing in them. From there I went to Telstra Health, the country’s largest digital health company, and I now lead clinical innovation at Bupa, one of Australia’s largest private health companies. I’ve kept my GP days in south-western Sydney the whole way through.

What is the product/work you are leading?

Getting health AI into clinicians’ hands in a way that patients feel the benefits of it too. Right now, one of my major projects is rolling out AI scribes across Bupa’s primary care health centres. Working with the technology is the fun part, it’s really good technology! Implementation is the trickier part that decides whether any of it works: training, workflow, governance, and convincing a busy practice to change how it does something on a Tuesday.

The other is that I’m co-supervising one of Australia’s first digital health and innovation extended skills RACGP registrar posts, based at Bupa. The idea is to give a registrar a proper taste of what this work actually involves, so they spend the term inside real projects rather than reading about them. Clinical governance of AI tools, product and design work alongside engineers and legal, how you evaluate whether something is safe and actually helping, and what it takes to get a good idea implemented across a network of clinics. 

I would have loved a term like that as a registrar, and it didn’t exist. Building the pathway for others has been a huge north star of mine.

What do you see as some of the enablers and barriers to health innovation in primary care in Australia?

The biggest enabler is that most practices are small businesses. A practice that decides to try something can be doing it the following week, which is not how it works in a hospital. There’s also a real appetite among GPs now to be in the room when these things are designed. 

The barrier is money. The funding model pays for the face-to-face consult, so anything preventive, asynchronous or delivered by a team struggles to find a business case even when the clinical argument is obvious. The other barrier is that our data still doesn’t move between systems, so every good idea eventually runs into an integration and interoperability problem.

 A practice that decides to try something can be doing it the following week, which is not how it works in a hospital.

What do you think general practice will look like in 25 years?

Hopefully a principled use of AI throughout the care journey. Clinicians with the right tools and the right information in front of them at the moment they have to make a call, and patients who feel like co-pilots in their own health rather than passengers. If we get it right, both of them feel a little less alone in it. That’s the version of the future I’m working towards.

Why is it important for GPs to be involved in health innovation/new technology design?

The frontline perspective. The gap between a tool that demos beautifully and one that survives a full waiting room is usually something only a person who has sat in that room would think to raise. If GPs aren’t there at design, those things get found after launch, by patients, and after a lot of money and resources have been sunk into it.

The other thing we bring is the generalist view. Most health tech gets built for one condition and one clean pathway, and that’s not who walks in. The patient has three other diagnoses, a medication list, something social going on, and the reason they booked isn’t the reason they came. GPs are the only ones designing from that starting point, and it’s usually the difference between a product that works for a cohort on a slide and one that works for the person in front of you.  

What would you say to early career doctors about general practice/primary healthcare?

It’s one of the most rewarding careers in medicine and, in my entirely biased opinion, the best job going. People will tell you it’s the safe option or the one you fall back on, and that’s just wrong. General practice is the broadest thing you can do. You see the whole of medicine, undifferentiated and unsorted, and you get very, very good at working out what matters when nobody has labelled it for you.

You look after people across years rather than episodes, and often across a whole family, which means you get told things nobody else gets told. That trust is earned slowly and it’s the most valuable thing I have professionally. It also doesn’t close anything off. My training is what got me into health tech, into industry, into policy conversations I never expected to be in, and none of those doors would have opened without the clinical grounding underneath.

But I still keep coming back to my consult room, because being the primary care provider to my patients and my community is a genuine honour and there isn’t a version of this work that gives me more than that does. If I were choosing again, I’d choose it again and again and again.